Comments on: Application Singleton http://blog.delphi-jedi.net/2009/10/26/application-singleton/ Joint Endeavor of Delphi Innovators of Windows Programming Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:44:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Philip http://blog.delphi-jedi.net/2009/10/26/application-singleton/comment-page-1/#comment-29641 Philip Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:32:41 +0000 http://blog.delphi-jedi.net/?p=497#comment-29641 Is SE_CREATE_GLOBAL_NAME really required for a Mutex? Reading http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa382954%28VS.85%29.aspx suggests that it is only needed for global MMFs. I haven't tested it, though. Is SE_CREATE_GLOBAL_NAME really required for a Mutex? Reading http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa382954%28VS.85%29.aspx suggests that it is only needed for global MMFs. I haven’t tested it, though.

]]> By: Christian Wimmer http://blog.delphi-jedi.net/2009/10/26/application-singleton/comment-page-1/#comment-28437 Christian Wimmer Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:24:09 +0000 http://blog.delphi-jedi.net/?p=497#comment-28437 Global\ prefix needs the SE_CREATE_GLOBAL_NAME TEXT("SeCreateGlobalPrivilege") privilege to create a global mutex. User programs can only check for session wide mutexes. OT: Now, I don't know. Sry. Global\ prefix needs the SE_CREATE_GLOBAL_NAME TEXT(”SeCreateGlobalPrivilege”) privilege to create a global mutex. User programs can only check for session wide mutexes.
OT: Now, I don’t know. Sry.

]]> By: Cd-MaN http://blog.delphi-jedi.net/2009/10/26/application-singleton/comment-page-1/#comment-28422 Cd-MaN Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:29:29 +0000 http://blog.delphi-jedi.net/?p=497#comment-28422 Shouldn't the name in the CreateMutex call include the "Global\" prefix to ensure that it is truly systemwide? OT: do you know a way to obtain the free TurboDelphi suite? The official line seems to be to "use the 30 day evaluation instead" :-( Shouldn’t the name in the CreateMutex call include the “Global\” prefix to ensure that it is truly systemwide?

OT: do you know a way to obtain the free TurboDelphi suite? The official line seems to be to “use the 30 day evaluation instead” :-(

]]>